Auckland port workers call for worker representation on Board

There are “1.7 million reasons” why this should happen immediately, following revelations on a payout made to former CEO Tony Gibson, who resigned in May.
Auck­land port work­ers are demand­ing work­er rep­re­sen­ta­tion on the Ports of Auck­land (POAL) Board.
Mar­itime Union of New Zealand Auck­land Branch Local 13 Sec­re­tary Rus­sell Mayn says there are “1.7 mil­lion rea­sons” why this should hap­pen imme­di­ate­ly, fol­low­ing rev­e­la­tions on a pay­out made to for­mer CEO Tony Gib­son, who resigned in May.
The POAL annu­al report shows an unnamed top earn­ing exec­u­tive was paid between $1.78m and $1.79m in the year to June 30.
Mr Mayn says work­ers want the imme­di­ate res­ig­na­tion of all Board mem­bers respon­si­ble for allow­ing such a pack­age to be agreed in the first place, includ­ing the inflat­ed salary.
He says the Union is mak­ing clear the call for res­ig­na­tions does not include recent­ly appoint­ed direc­tors who had been instru­men­tal in chang­ing the Health and Safe­ty cul­ture at the Ports.
“Board mem­bers whose gov­er­nance respon­si­bil­i­ties includes the deba­cle of automa­tion, sys­temic fail­ures in Health and Safe­ty, staff short­ages, and con­ges­tion issues have lost the trust and con­fi­dence of work­ers at the Port.”
Mr Mayn says the pay­out shows there is one rule for work­ers and anoth­er for Board Mem­bers and CEO’s.
“The mon­ey should have gone to the fam­i­lies of the work­ers who lost their lives work­ing at the Ports.”
Despite all the prob­lems dur­ing Mr Gibson’s regime, he received a pay­out of more than twen­ty years wages for a work­er, says Mr Mayn.
“Apart from the recent­ly appoint­ed Direc­tors, we want a clean slate and we want work­er rep­re­sen­ta­tion on the Board.”
Mr Mayn says there should be work­er rep­re­sen­ta­tives on the Boards on all Coun­cil and State Owned enter­pris­es.
“Work­er rep­re­sen­ta­tives on Boards would be a safe­guard that would pro­tect health and safe­ty and hold man­age­ment account­able.“
He says both Mr Gib­son and POAL are fac­ing charges under Health and Safe­ty leg­is­la­tion, and he was con­cerned to ensure Mr Gibson’s legal costs were not sub­si­dized by the port com­pa­ny and there­fore Auck­land ratepay­ers.
Share the Post:

Related Posts