Cutting ferry investment to subsidise property speculators is economic sabotage

The cost of the Government’s tax cuts for landlords will be many times more than the investment required for the much-needed Cook Strait ferry upgrade.

New ana­lys­is from the CTU shows the cost of the Government’s tax cuts for land­lords will be many times more than the invest­ment required for the much-needed Cook Strait ferry upgrade.

This shows the Gov­ern­ment mak­ing a clear choice to back unpro­duct­ive invest­ment in prop­erty over invest­ment in crit­ic­al infra­struc­ture that would help grow our eco­nomy and sup­port busi­ness, says CTU Eco­nom­ist Craig Ren­ney.

“Nation­al says the Inter-island Resi­li­ent Con­nec­tion pro­ject is too expens­ive, but our ana­lys­is shows that, over the life­time of the assets, the cost is only around $11 per New Zeal­ander a year in today’s dol­lars. Con­trast that to the land­lord tax cuts, which would cost $139 per Kiwi each year. Land­lord tax cuts are more than 12 times the cost of the Inter­is­lander pro­ject.

“This Gov­ern­ment was elec­ted with the slo­gan ‘get our coun­try back on track’ – yet one of its first acts is to derail a vital trans­port link between the North and South islands, which car­ries $14bn of freight and 850,000 people each year.

MUNZ Nation­al Sec­ret­ary Craig Har­ris­on says “The upgrade of the Cook Strait fer­ries is not an option for New Zea­l­and, it has to be done. The reg­u­lar tech­nic­al prob­lems exper­i­enced by the fer­ries are a res­ult of using end-of-life ves­sels in a chal­len­ging mari­time envir­on­ment.

“The fail­ure to mod­ern­ise this essen­tial infra­struc­ture leaves New Zea­l­and exposed to fur­ther delays, ser­vice out­ages, expense for industry, and ser­i­ous safety issues for crew and pas­sen­gers. The Government’s decision sets back New Zealand’s trans­port resi­li­ence and will set New Zea­l­and back.”

RMTU Gen­er­al Sec­ret­ary Todd Val­ster says “The Gov­ern­ment has stated they want KiwiRail to provide a safe and resi­li­ent ser­vice but that con­flicts with aging fer­ries due for replace­ment. KiwiRail has had rail-enabled fer­ries since 1962. Fer­ries that are rail enabled allow rail freight to be moved without freight hav­ing to come off rail wag­ons to travel the Cook Strait. Rail-enabled fer­ries are safer and more effi­cient to load and unload. The pro­posed new fer­ries would have pro­duced 40% few­er emis­sions, and the hull is designed to have a lower impact on the mar­ine envir­on­ment”.

Craig Ren­ney says “This is a gov­ern­ment that claims it is eco­nom­ic­ally respons­ible while it guts New Zealand’s freight capa­city and spends bil­lions on unpro­duct­ive tax cuts for prop­erty spec­u­lat­ors. For the future prosper­ity of our nation, New Zeal­anders need to be able to move them­selves and their goods around the coun­try in ways that get easi­er over time, not harder. The Gov­ern­ment should urgently reverse this mis­taken decision at the mini-Budget this week.


CTU analysis

We have mod­elled the costs asso­ci­ated with the $3bn pro­gramme over a 50-year aver­age life of the assets, using a 4% interest rate which is above the long-run aver­age for long-term New Zea­l­and Gov­ern­ment bonds. This con­ser­vat­ive ana­lys­is makes no assess­ment of the likely eco­nom­ic bene­fits of more reg­u­lar, safe, and reli­able cross­ings, which is likely to be in the range of many bil­lions in the peri­od. Nor does it make any assess­ment of the cost of leas­ing the replace­ment smal­ler fer­ries over the same peri­od, which again is likely to be in the low bil­lions.

This assess­ment also makes no ana­lys­is of the envir­on­ment­al costs of tak­ing freight off rail, the extra road­ing costs asso­ci­ated with more truck­ing, nor the con­tinu­ing use of less effi­cient fer­ries that pro­duce high­er emis­sions. All of which are likely to be very sig­ni­fic­ant.

We have also examined the cost of restor­ing interest deduc­tions for land­lords over the same peri­od. We have not assumed any new land­lords or any new growth in the rent­al mar­ket, simply that the cost of the policy rises with infla­tion. This is very likely to be an under­es­tim­ate of the real cost of the tax cuts.

We used the base case pop­u­la­tion fore­casts from Stat­ist­ics New Zea­l­and.

Nom­in­ally, the Inter-island Resi­li­ent Con­nec­tion would cost on aver­age $19.55 per per­son, per year over its life­time. Adjust­ing for infla­tion over the fifty-year peri­od, this would fall to an aver­age $11.12 per per­son, per year in 2025 dol­lars. The land­lord tax cut costs an aver­age of $232 per per­son, per year before infla­tion adjust­ment. After adjust­ment, each New Zeal­ander would be pay­ing $139 per per­son, per year in 2025 dol­lars.

Share:

One Response

  1. This is just anoth­er example of neo lib­er­al eco­nom­ic policies that favour the rich over the work­ing class. How can any sane per­son sup­port a tax gift to landlords/property developers over an essen­tial trans­port sys­tem between two islands! The trans­port sys­tem employs more work­ers than land­lords tax breaks! This just anoth­er example of a con­ser­vat­ive Gov­ern­ment adopt­ing the failed drip down eco­nom­ics through­out the world!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Welcome to the Maritime Union

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and was formed in 2002 when the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on joined togeth­er. We rep­res­ent water­front work­ers, sea­farers and related work­ers in New Zea­l­and.

Read More