Cutting ferry investment to subsidise property speculators is economic sabotage

The cost of the Government’s tax cuts for landlords will be many times more than the investment required for the much-needed Cook Strait ferry upgrade.

New analy­sis from the CTU shows the cost of the Government’s tax cuts for land­lords will be many times more than the invest­ment required for the much-need­ed Cook Strait fer­ry upgrade.

This shows the Gov­ern­ment mak­ing a clear choice to back unpro­duc­tive invest­ment in prop­er­ty over invest­ment in crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture that would help grow our econ­o­my and sup­port busi­ness, says CTU Econ­o­mist Craig Ren­ney.

“Nation­al says the Inter-island Resilient Con­nec­tion project is too expen­sive, but our analy­sis shows that, over the life­time of the assets, the cost is only around $11 per New Zealan­der a year in today’s dol­lars. Con­trast that to the land­lord tax cuts, which would cost $139 per Kiwi each year. Land­lord tax cuts are more than 12 times the cost of the Inter­is­lander project.

“This Gov­ern­ment was elect­ed with the slo­gan ‘get our coun­try back on track’ – yet one of its first acts is to derail a vital trans­port link between the North and South islands, which car­ries $14bn of freight and 850,000 peo­ple each year.

MUNZ Nation­al Sec­re­tary Craig Har­ri­son says “The upgrade of the Cook Strait fer­ries is not an option for New Zealand, it has to be done. The reg­u­lar tech­ni­cal prob­lems expe­ri­enced by the fer­ries are a result of using end-of-life ves­sels in a chal­leng­ing mar­itime envi­ron­ment.

“The fail­ure to mod­ernise this essen­tial infra­struc­ture leaves New Zealand exposed to fur­ther delays, ser­vice out­ages, expense for indus­try, and seri­ous safe­ty issues for crew and pas­sen­gers. The Government’s deci­sion sets back New Zealand’s trans­port resilience and will set New Zealand back.”

RMTU Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary Todd Val­ster says “The Gov­ern­ment has stat­ed they want KiwiRail to pro­vide a safe and resilient ser­vice but that con­flicts with aging fer­ries due for replace­ment. KiwiRail has had rail-enabled fer­ries since 1962. Fer­ries that are rail enabled allow rail freight to be moved with­out freight hav­ing to come off rail wag­ons to trav­el the Cook Strait. Rail-enabled fer­ries are safer and more effi­cient to load and unload. The pro­posed new fer­ries would have pro­duced 40% few­er emis­sions, and the hull is designed to have a low­er impact on the marine envi­ron­ment”.

Craig Ren­ney says “This is a gov­ern­ment that claims it is eco­nom­i­cal­ly respon­si­ble while it guts New Zealand’s freight capac­i­ty and spends bil­lions on unpro­duc­tive tax cuts for prop­er­ty spec­u­la­tors. For the future pros­per­i­ty of our nation, New Zealan­ders need to be able to move them­selves and their goods around the coun­try in ways that get eas­i­er over time, not hard­er. The Gov­ern­ment should urgent­ly reverse this mis­tak­en deci­sion at the mini-Bud­get this week.


CTU analysis

We have mod­elled the costs asso­ci­at­ed with the $3bn pro­gramme over a 50-year aver­age life of the assets, using a 4% inter­est rate which is above the long-run aver­age for long-term New Zealand Gov­ern­ment bonds. This con­ser­v­a­tive analy­sis makes no assess­ment of the like­ly eco­nom­ic ben­e­fits of more reg­u­lar, safe, and reli­able cross­ings, which is like­ly to be in the range of many bil­lions in the peri­od. Nor does it make any assess­ment of the cost of leas­ing the replace­ment small­er fer­ries over the same peri­od, which again is like­ly to be in the low bil­lions.

This assess­ment also makes no analy­sis of the envi­ron­men­tal costs of tak­ing freight off rail, the extra road­ing costs asso­ci­at­ed with more truck­ing, nor the con­tin­u­ing use of less effi­cient fer­ries that pro­duce high­er emis­sions. All of which are like­ly to be very sig­nif­i­cant.

We have also exam­ined the cost of restor­ing inter­est deduc­tions for land­lords over the same peri­od. We have not assumed any new land­lords or any new growth in the rental mar­ket, sim­ply that the cost of the pol­i­cy ris­es with infla­tion. This is very like­ly to be an under­es­ti­mate of the real cost of the tax cuts.

We used the base case pop­u­la­tion fore­casts from Sta­tis­tics New Zealand.

Nom­i­nal­ly, the Inter-island Resilient Con­nec­tion would cost on aver­age $19.55 per per­son, per year over its life­time. Adjust­ing for infla­tion over the fifty-year peri­od, this would fall to an aver­age $11.12 per per­son, per year in 2025 dol­lars. The land­lord tax cut costs an aver­age of $232 per per­son, per year before infla­tion adjust­ment. After adjust­ment, each New Zealan­der would be pay­ing $139 per per­son, per year in 2025 dol­lars.

Share the Post:

Related Posts