Inquiry Confirms Maritime Union Warnings on Manahau

Manahau barge grounding at Westport 2024
Findings from an official inquiry on the Manahau barge grounding obtained by media show the vessel was unsuitable for conditions and have absolved crew that were blamed for the grounding.
The Mar­itime Union of New Zealand (MUNZ) says the find­ings from an offi­cial inquiry on the Man­a­hau barge ground­ing obtained by media show the ves­sel was unsuit­able for con­di­tions and have absolved crew that were blamed for the ground­ing.
A Mar­itime New Zealand inves­ti­ga­tion sum­ma­ry obtained by media con­firms MUNZ’s claims from the out­set of the 2024 inci­dent at West­port.
Mar­itime Union of New Zealand Nation­al Sec­re­tary Carl Find­lay says the union and its mem­bers are not sur­prised by the find­ings.
“MUNZ stat­ed from day one that the Man­a­hau was an inap­pro­pri­ate, under­pow­ered ves­sel for the rugged West Coast,” says Mr. Find­lay.
He says WMS pre­vi­ous­ly attempt­ed to “throw the crew under the bus,” by releas­ing its own in-house report to blame the crew for the ground­ing.
How­ev­er, accord­ing to doc­u­ments obtained by the media, it has been found WMS failed to doc­u­ment and imple­ment a safe sys­tem of work for anchor­ing, par­tic­u­lar­ly in adverse con­di­tions.
WMS also failed to fol­low safe oper­a­tional pro­ce­dures when adverse weath­er con­di­tions pre­vent­ed safe access to West­port, and it failed to con­sult, co-oper­ate with, and co-ordi­nate safe oper­at­ing pro­ce­dures with StarHigh Asia Pacif­ic PTE Ltd, the com­pa­ny it con­tract­ed to man­age the vessel’s safe­ty man­age­ment sys­tem.
WMS claim to be con­cerned for ‘its peo­ple’ had no cred­i­bil­i­ty at this point, says Mr. Find­lay.
“They have tried to weasel their way out of respon­si­bil­i­ty all the way.”
He says it is “bizarre” WMS had appar­ent­ly accept­ed the for­mal warn­ing from Mar­itime NZ but was con­tin­u­ing to refer to its own in-house report which con­tra­dicts the offi­cial find­ings.
“There are only two reports that count – the report from Mar­itime New Zealand and the forth­com­ing report from the Trans­port Acci­dent Inves­ti­ga­tion Com­mis­sion (TAIC). These are inde­pen­dent and cred­i­ble author­i­ties.”
The Man­a­hau was a for­eign-flagged ves­sel, oper­at­ed by a for­eign crew who were denied access to union sup­port in the imme­di­ate after­math of the ground­ing, and who were repa­tri­at­ed as soon as pos­si­ble by their employ­ers.
Mr Find­lay says at a time of high unem­ploy­ment for skilled New Zealand work­ers, WMS were seek­ing to use for­eign crews and for­eign-flagged ves­sels that are not fit for pur­pose.
“A qual­i­fied New Zealand crew would have under­stood the treach­er­ous con­di­tions of the West Coast.”
MUNZ says the required out­come is for Mar­itime NZ to insist the com­pa­ny finds a suit­able, safe new ves­sel for any future West Coast oper­a­tions, oper­at­ing under a New Zealand flag.
That ves­sel must be crewed by a New Zealand crew.
Mr Find­lay says MUNZ would be hap­py to assist WMS to find a qual­i­fied New Zealand crew that were paid at New Zealand mar­ket rates once they source an appro­pri­ate new ves­sel.
“We are only a phone call away.”
Share the Post:

Related Posts