International report on Auckland Port automation shows safety and economic dangers of privatisation proposals

A new report from the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) – Lessons in failure: Automation at the Ports of Auckland – demonstrates the risks presented by any privatisation of the Ports of Auckland.

A new report from the Inter­na­tion­al Trans­port Work­ers’ Fed­er­a­tion (ITF) – Les­sons in fail­ure: Auto­ma­tion at the Ports of Auck­land – demon­strates the risks presen­ted by any privat­isa­tion of the Ports of Auck­land, says the Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and.

Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and Nation­al Sec­ret­ary Craig Har­ris­on says the raises import­ant red flags in the privat­isa­tion debate.

He says while the report is focused on the fail­ures of the auto­ma­tion pro­ject, it illus­trates how bad privat­isa­tion would be for the Auck­land eco­nomy and for the nation­al eco­nomy.

“The first issue is the claim Ports of Auck­land is a fin­an­cial fail­ure. The report shows POAL was one of the best per­form­ing ports in the South­ern Hemi­sphere before auto­ma­tion and it is return­ing back to that level of oper­a­tion now man­age­ment has changed, and auto­ma­tion has been aban­doned.

“The second issue is the huge cost of the auto­ma­tion fail­ure to the eco­nomy. Work­ers paid for it with their lives and the drop in through­put and the con­ges­tion that it cre­ated cost Aotearoa New Zea­l­and more than a bil­lion dol­lars. There is a huge risk attached to fur­ther med­dling in port oper­a­tions. Hand­ing over the Ports to off­shore own­ers would give them massive lever­age over our entire eco­nomy and poten­tially put lives at risk.”

“The third issue is how a private own­er could find effi­cien­cies in cur­rent oper­a­tions.

“The former POAL man­age­ment tried auto­ma­tion and attack­ing work­ing con­di­tions and the res­ult was effi­ciency went down. The new port man­age­ment real­ise that and are work­ing with the uni­on, and POAL oper­a­tions are quickly return­ing to their former levels of through­put.

“This report shows there’s no fat to cut in port oper­a­tions. The only way a private oper­at­or could get the kind of return they expect would be to pump up prices and the costs to Auck­land busi­nesses and, ulti­mately, to the people of Auck­land and our eco­nomy as a whole.

One of the report’s authors, Pro­fess­or Nigel Haworth, agrees.

“We ran a micro­scope across port oper­a­tions and clearly iden­ti­fied the ter­rible harm the ‘go-faster’ approach had on safety. People paid for it with their lives. Along­side that there was a huge fin­an­cial impact caused by attempt­ing to auto­mate a port that wasn’t suit­able for it.

“There are ser­i­ous les­sons to be learned from this report for oth­er ports con­sid­er­ing auto­mat­ing, but also for the future of Ports of Auck­land.

“Ports of Auck­land is crit­ic­al infra­struc­ture and is effect­ively a mono­poly. Put­ting it in private hands would give the own­er a licence to strip-mine Auckland’s busi­nesses and our eco­nomy and risk a return to the dan­ger­ous and unsafe prac­tices that left so many fam­il­ies of work­ers bereaved.”

Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Welcome to the Maritime Union

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and was formed in 2002 when the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on joined togeth­er. We rep­res­ent water­front work­ers, sea­farers and related work­ers in New Zea­l­and.

Read More