Maersk decision shows supply chains still at risk

Unions representing ships crews say the withdrawal of a dedicated Maersk shipping service on the New Zealand coast is a step backwards for New Zealand’s supply chain security.

Uni­ons rep­res­ent­ing ships crews say the with­draw­al of a ded­ic­ated Maersk ship­ping ser­vice on the New Zea­l­and coast is a step back­wards for New Zealand’s sup­ply chain secur­ity.

Maersk announced today that it was with­draw­ing its Coastal Con­nect ser­vice after less than a year in oper­a­tion, with the loss of all jobs of New Zea­l­and crews.

The Maersk Nandi and the Maersk Nan­sha are the two con­tain­er ships that have been provid­ing a ded­ic­ated New Zea­l­and coastal ser­vice to ports in Auck­land, Taur­anga, Nel­son, Lyt­telton and Timaru.

The coastal ser­vice was seen as a break­through in provid­ing reli­able ser­vices to New Zea­l­and ports fol­low­ing massive dis­rup­tion to ship­ping sched­ules fol­low­ing the COVID pan­dem­ic.

Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and Nation­al Sec­ret­ary Craig Har­ris­on says the sud­den with­draw­al of the Coastal Con­nect ser­vice shows how volat­ile and insec­ure New Zealand’s sup­ply chain remains.

The can­celled Maersk ser­vices will be replaced by new inter­na­tion­al ser­vices that drop some New Zea­l­and ports off their calls and use Aus­trali­an ports as hubs.

“This con­tinu­al mar­ket volat­il­ity is bad for New Zea­l­and and will have a flow on effect to import­ers and export­ers, and thus the whole eco­nomy.”

Mr Har­ris­on says New Zea­l­and is mak­ing good pro­gress with coastal ship­ping, and although the Maersk decision was a set­back, there is still an over­all pos­it­ive tra­ject­ory for coastal ship­ping.

“We saw a num­ber of new ships and ser­vices com­ing onto the New Zea­l­and coast in the last year, largely due to Gov­ern­ment enga­ging with industry and hav­ing a plan which we haven’t had for dec­ades.”

He says there is cur­rently high demand for New Zea­l­and sea­farers, and he is hope­ful redund­ant crews would be re-employed in the industry.

He says the mari­time uni­ons will be ask­ing Maersk to provide train­ing pos­i­tions for New Zea­l­and crew aboard the new ser­vices.

“This is a com­pany that has made very large profits from New Zea­l­and over dec­ades, and they need to show stronger com­mit­ment and social respons­ib­il­ity.”

Mr Har­ris­on says the clear mes­sage is New Zea­l­and is at the bot­tom of the pri­or­ity list for glob­al ship­pers.

“If New Zea­l­and does not get its act togeth­er with a nation­al port strategy, we are going to see hub­bing hap­pen­ing in Aus­tralia, and New Zea­l­and ports fur­ther down the peck­ing order.”

Mr Har­ris­on says one obvi­ous option is to get state owned enter­prise KiwiRail, who oper­ate inter island Cook Strait fer­ries, to diver­si­fy by leas­ing ships to meet the demand for coastal ship­ping.

The three uni­ons all have mem­bers aboard the affected Maersk ves­sels – the Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and rep­res­ent­ing sea­farers, the New Zea­l­and Mer­chant Ser­vice Guild rep­res­ent­ing ship’s mas­ters and officers, and the Avi­ation and Mar­ine Engin­eers Asso­ci­ation rep­res­ent­ing mar­ine engin­eers.

Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Welcome to the Maritime Union

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and was formed in 2002 when the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on joined togeth­er. We rep­res­ent water­front work­ers, sea­farers and related work­ers in New Zea­l­and.

Read More