Maritime Union concerned with reduction in ship inspections

The Maritime Union of New Zealand is concerned about the reduction in monitoring of international shipping by Maritime New Zealand, the Government agency responsible for ensuring a “safe, secure and clean” maritime environment.

The Mar­itime Union of New Zealand is con­cerned about the reduc­tion in mon­i­tor­ing of inter­na­tion­al ship­ping by Mar­itime New Zealand, the Gov­ern­ment agency respon­si­ble for ensur­ing a “safe, secure and clean” mar­itime envi­ron­ment.

Less than half of “Pri­or­i­ty 1” ves­sels (49%) com­ing into New Zealand were inspect­ed in the 2014/2015 year, accord­ing to Mar­itime New Zealand’s annu­al report.

That is well beneath the tar­get of 70% inspec­tions for the year, and the 82% of inspec­tions achieved in the 2013/2014 year.

Mar­itime Union of New Zealand nation­al sec­re­tary Joe Fleet­wood says the mon­i­tor­ing and inves­ti­ga­tion of com­pli­ance by inter­na­tion­al ship­ping was a key role of the agency.

While the roll­out of the new Mar­itime Oper­a­tor Safe­ty Sys­tem (MOSS) was an under­stand­able focus for resources, as out­lined in the report, this could not get in the way of the basic respon­si­bil­i­ties of the agency.

If there was a resourc­ing prob­lem, then that need­ed to be dealt with by appro­pri­ate resourc­ing by the Gov­ern­ment, not sim­ply set aside, he says.

Accord­ing to Mar­itime New Zealand, a greater empha­sis is being placed on “engag­ing” with inter­na­tion­al part­ners to lift the qual­i­ty of ship­ping and reduce the lev­el of risk before ships enter New Zealand waters.

Mr Fleet­wood says the Mar­itime Union did not agree with this empha­sis.

While the Union sup­port­ed work­ing with inter­na­tion­al part­ners and strength­en­ing inter­na­tion­al mar­itime agree­ments, the abil­i­ty of New Zealand to engage with “Flag of Con­ve­nience” ship­ping reg­istries such as Liberia or Pana­ma was lim­it­ed or pos­si­bly non-exis­tent in a prac­ti­cal sense.

Strin­gent inspec­tions as part of Port State Con­trol should remain the bedrock of mar­itime com­pli­ance, he says.

The dereg­u­lat­ed nature of the glob­al ship­ping indus­try meant a stick was required as well as car­rots to ensure stan­dards were main­tained.

Mr Fleet­wood says the lessons of light hand­ed reg­u­la­tion in issues of safe­ty and com­pli­ance in recent New Zealand indus­tri­al his­to­ry could be summed up by the Pike Riv­er Mine dis­as­ter and the Rena ground­ing.

In addi­tion, the prob­lems in the fish­ing indus­try over many years went back to New Zealand allow­ing indus­try to reg­u­late itself with dis­as­trous results as the low­est com­mon denom­i­na­tor set the stan­dard of “glob­al worst prac­tice.”

Mr Fleet­wood says there are fre­quent and reg­u­lar issues with inter­na­tion­al ship­ping in New Zealand waters, and the Union togeth­er with the Inter­na­tion­al Trans­port Work­ers’ Fed­er­a­tion (ITF), often had to step in to resolve issues on behalf of for­eign crews.

The Mar­itime Union would be seek­ing assur­ances that inspec­tions of ves­sels by Mar­itime New Zealand would be a top pri­or­i­ty.

Share the Post:

Related Posts