Maritime Union, Labour & Greens Call for Action on Methyl Bromide

Press releas­es were issued this morn­ing by the Mar­itime Union of New Zealand, and our allies in the Labour and Green Par­ties. They are reprint­ed below. 

Maritime Union calls on poisonous ports to stop spewing methyl bromide

The Mar­itime Union of New Zealand wel­comes the deci­sion by Ports of Auck­land to stop releas­ing methyl bro­mide emis­sions into the air.

The move to ful­ly recap­ture the tox­ic gas after fumi­ga­tion sets a new bench­mark for indus­try best prac­tice.

Methyl bro­mide, linked to motor neu­rone dis­ease and harm­ful to the ozone lay­er, is used to kill insects in logs before export.

MUNZ Nation­al Sec­re­tary Joe Fleet­wood says the deci­sion is an exam­ple of what pub­licly owned ports can deliv­er, if and when they pri­or­i­tize com­mu­ni­ty inter­ests.

“We will con­tin­ue the cam­paign to stop rogue employ­ers expos­ing peo­ple to methyl bro­mide for anoth­er decade if need be,” says Mr Fleet­wood.

“Elim­i­nat­ing the risk from our ports and com­mu­ni­ties will save lives.”

After fumi­ga­tion is com­plete the gas can be recap­tured and turned into a dis­pos­able salt. How­ev­er, some ports instead release the tox­ic fumes into our air, endan­ger­ing work­ers and near­by com­mu­ni­ties.

Mar­itime Union mem­bers work­ing in New Zealand ports that use the fumi­gant have voiced seri­ous con­cerns, fear­ing their employ­ers are not tak­ing health and safe­ty seri­ous­ly around methyl bro­mide.

In the Port of Tau­ran­ga there is a 200 metre buffer zone put in place dur­ing cruise ships vis­its to pro­tect the tourists.

Port work­ers, by con­trast, are expect­ed to con­duct ‘nor­mal oper­a­tions’ as close as five metres away from the tox­ic gas.

A union mem­ber in Tau­ran­ga reports being told the logs are “safe enough to lick”.

MUNZ mem­bers describe cough­ing, light head­ed­ness and nasal con­ges­tion dur­ing gas release, despite being told they were out of range and in no dan­ger of expo­sure.

The union believes unnec­es­sary rival­ry between pub­licly-owned ports is under­min­ing best prac­tice stan­dards, and dri­ving a race to the bot­tom in the indus­try.

“The Gov­ern­ment must not allow best prac­tice in some ports to be under­mined else­where,” says Mr Fleet­wood.

“If Welling­ton and Auck­land can do the right thing, all ports must.”

The Mar­itime Union con­tin­ues to call for a total ban on the use of methyl bro­mide.

“The reg­u­la­to­ry bod­ies are tooth­less tigers,” says Mr Fleet­wood.

“The gov­ern­ment must stop ports releas­ing this poi­son into the air, or live with blood on their hands.”

ENDS

Labour: Ports of Auckland decision a win for workers and the environment

MEDIA STATEMENT: 29 May 2017

Ports of Auckland’s deci­sion to no longer release the tox­ic fumi­gant methyl bro­mide into the atmos­phere is a win for their work­ers and for the envi­ron­ment, says Labour’s Spokesper­son for Biose­cu­ri­ty Damien O’Connor.

“The inten­tion to move to a full ‘recap­ture’ sys­tem by the end of the year, instead of the cur­rent prac­tice of sim­ply vent­ing the gas into the atmos­phere, shows lead­er­ship and respon­si­bil­i­ty by Ports man­age­ment.

“Cur­rent­ly, work­ers and peo­ple liv­ing or work­ing near a port using methyl bro­mide are poten­tial­ly at risk from breath­ing the colour­less and odour­less gas. I’m remind­ed of the deaths of up to six peo­ple from motor neu­rone dis­ease in Nel­son between 2002 and 2005. While the direct link to methyl bro­mide was incon­clu­sive, it should nev­er have been pos­si­ble that peo­ple were harmed from its use as a fumi­gant.

“The Mar­itime Union is just­ly cel­e­brat­ing this announce­ment, after more than ten years of cam­paign­ing with oth­er groups to improve safe­ty around the use of this dan­ger­ous chem­i­cal.

“Methyl bro­mide is also ozone-deplet­ing. We’re becom­ing more and more con­scious of the effects of indus­try on the envi­ron­ment, and we still have work to do in many areas. Any com­pa­ny that improves its own prac­tice deserves cred­it.

“Ports of Auckland’s deci­sion will sure­ly put pres­sure on the remain­ing ports around New Zealand which still release methyl bro­mide,” says Damien O’Connor.

ENDS

Greens: Port’s decision a win for workers and environment

The Green Par­ty is applaud­ing the deci­sion by the Ports of Auck­land to require total recap­ture of the tox­ic gas methyl bro­mide at the port by the end of the year, and says oth­er ports must now fol­low suit.

Methyl bro­mide is used to fumi­gate logs for export. Expo­sure to the gas, when it’s not safe­ly recap­tured, can pose seri­ous risks to people’s health and con­tributes to the deple­tion of the ozone lay­er.

“We’re real­ly pleased by this deci­sion. The Green Par­ty has been cam­paign­ing for years along­side work­ers, com­mu­ni­ty groups and many oth­ers to end the expo­sure of peo­ple to this tox­ic gas,” said Green Par­ty pes­ti­cide spokesper­son Stef­fan Brown­ing.

“Methyl bro­mide, if inhaled, can have long-term impacts on the brain, and increase the risk of can­cers and neu­ro­log­i­cal issues. We should­n’t be expos­ing any­one to this stuff.

“Fol­low­ing an Envi­ron­ment Court deci­sion in Tau­ran­ga point­ing to the non-com­pli­ance of the fumi­ga­tor there, Ports of Auck­land is doing the right thing, putting the safe­ty of peo­ple and the envi­ron­ment first.

“Oth­er ports need to fol­low suit. Ports in Napi­er, Tau­ran­ga and Whangarei have very lim­it­ed recap­ture going on and that puts peo­ple work­ing at the port and liv­ing near­by at risk of expo­sure.

“The Tau­ran­ga deci­sion showed that New Zealand is not on track to meet its Mon­tre­al Pro­to­col oblig­a­tion to ful­ly recap­ture, and reduce the use of, methyl bro­mide.

“There’s a real need for Gov­ern­ment to be more proac­tive and push the ports to improve recap­ture. The Gov­ern­ment said it would require manda­to­ry recap­ture by 2020, but that is too late and many ports or log exporters have no plan in place to achieve this,” said Mr Brown­ing.

ENDS

Share the Post:

Related Posts