Maritime Union welcomes release of 1951 lockout papers

The Maritime Union of New Zealand has welcomed the release of secret SIS papers on the 1951 waterfront lockout to Archives New Zealand. Maritime Union General Secretary Trevor Hanson says the 1951 waterfront lockout was the most significant industrial event in living memory in New Zealand. He says the Maritime Union still counts veterans of the 1951 dispute amongst its retired members.

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and has wel­comed the release of secret SIS papers on the 1951 water­front lock­out to Archives New Zea­l­and. Mari­time Uni­on Gen­er­al Sec­ret­ary Tre­vor Han­son says the 1951 water­front lock­out was the most sig­ni­fic­ant indus­tri­al event in liv­ing memory in New Zea­l­and. He says the Mari­time Uni­on still counts vet­er­ans of the 1951 dis­pute amongst its retired mem­bers.
The Mari­time Uni­on was formed in 2002 from the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on.
Mr Han­son says the con­tent of the papers would speak for them­selves. He says the 151-day dis­pute was a lock­out, not a strike.
“The fact of the mat­ter is that the work­ers were locked out of their jobs by a Nation­al Gov­ern­ment who wanted to des­troy the most pro­gress­ive and mil­it­ant group with­in the New Zea­l­and work­ing class.”
Mr Han­son says the 1951 lock­out was looked back on now as a time of shame when basic prin­ciples of free speech and free­dom of asso­ci­ation were over­turned by a right-wing Gov­ern­ment.
“It is no exag­ger­a­tion to say that the so-called emer­gency reg­u­la­tions at the time swung close to fas­cism and a police state.”
Mr Han­son says the stress and hard­ship placed on fam­il­ies dur­ing the lock­out was extreme.
“It was made illeg­al for any­one to sup­ply food to the chil­dren of a water­front work­er. People’s lives were des­troyed.”
He says the large quant­ity of research and pub­lic­a­tions on the 1951 dis­pute had noted the extreme nature of the State’s actions against its own cit­izens.
“The water­front uni­on­ists and rank and file sea­farers stood side by side in the dis­pute, along with thou­sands of oth­er work­ers around the coun­try. Many of these mari­time work­ers had recently served in the Second World War against fas­cism but were turned on in their own coun­try.”
Mr Han­son says that the Nation­al Gov­ern­ment’s goal of smash­ing the water­front uni­on ulti­mately failed.
“The water­front work­ers slowly rebuilt their uni­ons, got rid of the scabs who had been brought into replace them, and over time man­aged to win back good wages and con­di­tions.”
He says the main les­son to draw from his­tory was that the Nation­al Party had nev­er been a friend of work­ing people, and that was some­thing that work­ing people needed to remem­ber in 2008.

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and has wel­comed the release of secret SIS papers on the 1951 water­front lock­out to Archives New Zea­l­and.

Mari­time Uni­on Gen­er­al Sec­ret­ary Tre­vor Han­son says the 1951 water­front lock­out was the most sig­ni­fic­ant indus­tri­al event in liv­ing memory in New Zea­l­and.

He says the Mari­time Uni­on still counts vet­er­ans of the 1951 dis­pute amongst its retired mem­bers.

The Mari­time Uni­on was formed in 2002 from the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on.

Mr Han­son says the con­tent of the papers would speak for them­selves. He says the 151-day dis­pute was a lock­out, not a strike.

“The fact of the mat­ter is that the work­ers were locked out of their jobs by a Nation­al Gov­ern­ment who wanted to des­troy the most pro­gress­ive and mil­it­ant group with­in the New Zea­l­and work­ing class.”

Mr Han­son says the 1951 lock­out was looked back on now as a time of shame when basic prin­ciples of free speech and free­dom of asso­ci­ation were over­turned by a right-wing Gov­ern­ment.

“It is no exag­ger­a­tion to say that the so-called emer­gency reg­u­la­tions at the time swung close to fas­cism and a police state.”

Mr Han­son says the stress and hard­ship placed on fam­il­ies dur­ing the lock­out was extreme.

“It was made illeg­al for any­one to sup­ply food to the chil­dren of a water­front work­er. People’s lives were des­troyed.”

He says the large quant­ity of research and pub­lic­a­tions on the 1951 dis­pute had noted the extreme nature of the State’s actions against its own cit­izens.

“The water­front uni­on­ists and rank and file sea­farers stood side by side in the dis­pute, along with thou­sands of oth­er work­ers around the coun­try. Many of these mari­time work­ers had recently served in the Second World War against fas­cism but were turned on in their own coun­try.”

Mr Han­son says that the Nation­al Gov­ern­ment’s goal of smash­ing the water­front uni­on ulti­mately failed.

“The water­front work­ers slowly rebuilt their uni­ons, got rid of the scabs who had been brought into replace them, and over time man­aged to win back good wages and con­di­tions.”

He says the main les­son to draw from his­tory was that the Nation­al Party had nev­er been a friend of work­ing people, and that was some­thing that work­ing people needed to remem­ber in 2008.

Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Welcome to the Maritime Union

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and was formed in 2002 when the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on joined togeth­er. We rep­res­ent water­front work­ers, sea­farers and related work­ers in New Zea­l­and.

Read More