Maritime Union welcomes release of 1951 lockout papers

The Maritime Union of New Zealand has welcomed the release of secret SIS papers on the 1951 waterfront lockout to Archives New Zealand. Maritime Union General Secretary Trevor Hanson says the 1951 waterfront lockout was the most significant industrial event in living memory in New Zealand. He says the Maritime Union still counts veterans of the 1951 dispute amongst its retired members.

The Mar­itime Union of New Zealand has wel­comed the release of secret SIS papers on the 1951 water­front lock­out to Archives New Zealand. Mar­itime Union Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary Trevor Han­son says the 1951 water­front lock­out was the most sig­nif­i­cant indus­tri­al event in liv­ing mem­o­ry in New Zealand. He says the Mar­itime Union still counts vet­er­ans of the 1951 dis­pute amongst its retired mem­bers.
The Mar­itime Union was formed in 2002 from the New Zealand Water­front Work­ers’ Union and the New Zealand Sea­far­ers’ Union.
Mr Han­son says the con­tent of the papers would speak for them­selves. He says the 151-day dis­pute was a lock­out, not a strike.
“The fact of the mat­ter is that the work­ers were locked out of their jobs by a Nation­al Gov­ern­ment who want­ed to destroy the most pro­gres­sive and mil­i­tant group with­in the New Zealand work­ing class.”
Mr Han­son says the 1951 lock­out was looked back on now as a time of shame when basic prin­ci­ples of free speech and free­dom of asso­ci­a­tion were over­turned by a right-wing Gov­ern­ment.
“It is no exag­ger­a­tion to say that the so-called emer­gency reg­u­la­tions at the time swung close to fas­cism and a police state.”
Mr Han­son says the stress and hard­ship placed on fam­i­lies dur­ing the lock­out was extreme.
“It was made ille­gal for any­one to sup­ply food to the chil­dren of a water­front work­er. Peo­ple’s lives were destroyed.”
He says the large quan­ti­ty of research and pub­li­ca­tions on the 1951 dis­pute had not­ed the extreme nature of the State’s actions against its own cit­i­zens.
“The water­front union­ists and rank and file sea­far­ers stood side by side in the dis­pute, along with thou­sands of oth­er work­ers around the coun­try. Many of these mar­itime work­ers had recent­ly served in the Sec­ond World War against fas­cism but were turned on in their own coun­try.”
Mr Han­son says that the Nation­al Gov­ern­men­t’s goal of smash­ing the water­front union ulti­mate­ly failed.
“The water­front work­ers slow­ly rebuilt their unions, got rid of the scabs who had been brought into replace them, and over time man­aged to win back good wages and con­di­tions.”
He says the main les­son to draw from his­to­ry was that the Nation­al Par­ty had nev­er been a friend of work­ing peo­ple, and that was some­thing that work­ing peo­ple need­ed to remem­ber in 2008.

The Mar­itime Union of New Zealand has wel­comed the release of secret SIS papers on the 1951 water­front lock­out to Archives New Zealand.

Mar­itime Union Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary Trevor Han­son says the 1951 water­front lock­out was the most sig­nif­i­cant indus­tri­al event in liv­ing mem­o­ry in New Zealand.

He says the Mar­itime Union still counts vet­er­ans of the 1951 dis­pute amongst its retired mem­bers.

The Mar­itime Union was formed in 2002 from the New Zealand Water­front Work­ers’ Union and the New Zealand Sea­far­ers’ Union.

Mr Han­son says the con­tent of the papers would speak for them­selves. He says the 151-day dis­pute was a lock­out, not a strike.

“The fact of the mat­ter is that the work­ers were locked out of their jobs by a Nation­al Gov­ern­ment who want­ed to destroy the most pro­gres­sive and mil­i­tant group with­in the New Zealand work­ing class.”

Mr Han­son says the 1951 lock­out was looked back on now as a time of shame when basic prin­ci­ples of free speech and free­dom of asso­ci­a­tion were over­turned by a right-wing Gov­ern­ment.

“It is no exag­ger­a­tion to say that the so-called emer­gency reg­u­la­tions at the time swung close to fas­cism and a police state.”

Mr Han­son says the stress and hard­ship placed on fam­i­lies dur­ing the lock­out was extreme.

“It was made ille­gal for any­one to sup­ply food to the chil­dren of a water­front work­er. Peo­ple’s lives were destroyed.”

He says the large quan­ti­ty of research and pub­li­ca­tions on the 1951 dis­pute had not­ed the extreme nature of the State’s actions against its own cit­i­zens.

“The water­front union­ists and rank and file sea­far­ers stood side by side in the dis­pute, along with thou­sands of oth­er work­ers around the coun­try. Many of these mar­itime work­ers had recent­ly served in the Sec­ond World War against fas­cism but were turned on in their own coun­try.”

Mr Han­son says that the Nation­al Gov­ern­men­t’s goal of smash­ing the water­front union ulti­mate­ly failed.

“The water­front work­ers slow­ly rebuilt their unions, got rid of the scabs who had been brought into replace them, and over time man­aged to win back good wages and con­di­tions.”

He says the main les­son to draw from his­to­ry was that the Nation­al Par­ty had nev­er been a friend of work­ing peo­ple, and that was some­thing that work­ing peo­ple need­ed to remem­ber in 2008.

Share the Post:

Related Posts