Overseas trade endangered unless New Zealand has a maritime strategy

The Maritime Union of New Zealand says that New Zealand's overseas trade could be in jeopardy unless the Government has a plan for ports and the maritime sector. Maritime Union General Secretary Joe Fleetwood, responding to comments from the Minister of Transport Hon. Stephen Joyce, says it is not good enough for the Government to leave it to chance when 99% of New Zealand's imports and exports are shipped. He says that there is widespread concern in the industry that in future cargo could be hubbed through a large Australian port, with complex and negative effects for New Zealand.

The Mar­itime Union of New Zealand says that New Zealand’s over­seas trade could be in jeop­ardy unless the Gov­ern­ment has a plan for ports and the mar­itime sec­tor.

Mar­itime Union Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary Joe Fleet­wood, respond­ing to com­ments from the Min­is­ter of Trans­port Hon. Stephen Joyce, says it is not good enough for the Gov­ern­ment to leave it to chance when 99% of New Zealand’s imports and exports are shipped.

He says that there is wide­spread con­cern in the indus­try that in future car­go could be hubbed through a large Aus­tralian port, with com­plex and neg­a­tive effects for New Zealand.

“This deci­sion would be made by glob­al ship­ping lines, whose inter­est is their own prof­it, not New Zealand’s long term eco­nom­ic secu­ri­ty.”

Mr Fleet­wood says that an Octo­ber 2009 report from Auck­land Region­al Hold­ings, the busi­ness arm of Auck­land Region­al Coun­cil (ARC), had not­ed the risk that, over time, New Zealand con­tain­ers would be hubbed through Aus­tralia.

Fur­ther com­ments last week from retir­ing Paci­fi­ca Ship­ping CEO Rod Grout backed up the view the cur­rent hands-off approach could end with New Zealand car­go being hubbed through Syd­ney or Mel­bourne.

Mr Fleet­wood says the views of the mar­itime indus­try appear to be falling on deaf ears.

He says an exam­ple of poten­tial prob­lems could be seen with what had hap­pened when Fonter­ra had changed its trans­port mode in South Can­ter­bury with no warn­ing from the Port of Timaru to long dis­tance rail.

This had led to severe pres­sure on the port, and was just one of a num­ber of exam­ples where ports had risked major invest­ments in infra­struc­ture to build capac­i­ty, only to be left in the lurch by glob­al ship­ping com­pa­nies.

“This sit­u­a­tion if repeat­ed on a larg­er scale through hub­bing to Aus­tralia due to deci­sions of ship­ping com­pa­nies could result in huge dis­rup­tion to region­al economies, mil­lions of dol­lars of infra­struc­ture being moth­balled, and our trans­port chain in chaos.”

Mr Fleet­wood says Mr Joyce’s claim that changes in the port sec­tor would occur nat­u­ral­ly over time showed the Gov­ern­ment did not grasp the impli­ca­tions of recent devel­op­ments.

He says the Mar­itime Union wants a long term nation­al strat­e­gy to ensure any ratio­nal­iza­tion of ports is achieved through a planned and non-destruc­tive process.

Ports should be inte­grat­ed through a “KiwiPort” sys­tem and coastal ship­ping had to receive the same sup­port that road and rail did to cre­ate a effec­tive, New Zealand-con­trolled trans­port sys­tem.

Share the Post:

Related Posts