Unions unite in Ports of Auckland labour blunder

The Ports of Auckland has been put on notice from Unions that it will have to train its own workforce rather than fly in staff from other ports. The port company wants to transfer skilled labour from Wellington and Lyttelton to keep up with work after 12 weeks ago laying off a substantial number of workers. Maritime Union of New Zealand National Vice President Garry Parsloe says the situation is a result of the port company ignoring Union advice. "They were told there were too many redundancies, and it would create a shortage of skilled workers. Now this has happened." He says that the Maritime Union would only agree for Unionised workers being transferred into Auckland if there was a written commitment from the Ports of Auckland to train a sufficient number of its own workforce.

The Ports of Auck­land has been put on notice from Uni­ons that it will have to train its own work­force rather than fly in staff from oth­er ports.

The port com­pany wants to trans­fer skilled labour from Wel­ling­ton and Lyt­telton to keep up with work after 12 weeks ago lay­ing off a sub­stan­tial num­ber of work­ers.

Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and Nation­al Vice Pres­id­ent Garry Parsloe says the situ­ation is a res­ult of the port com­pany ignor­ing Uni­on advice.

“They were told there were too many redund­an­cies, and it would cre­ate a short­age of skilled work­ers. Now this has happened.”

He says that the Mari­time Uni­on would only agree for Uni­on­ised work­ers being trans­ferred into Auck­land if there was a writ­ten com­mit­ment from the Ports of Auck­land to train a suf­fi­cient num­ber of its own work­force.

Rail and Mari­time Trans­port Uni­on Gen­er­al Sec­ret­ary Wayne But­son con­firmed his Uni­on had a united stance with MUNZ on the issue.

There were con­cerns that the Port Com­pany was attempt­ing to play off the uni­ons against each oth­er.

He says the issue is about port employ­ers main­tain­ing skilled staff at their port, an issue that both uni­ons have the same pos­i­tion on.

“Any prudent port employ­er knows they must provide for volume vari­ab­il­ity of ton­nage. Hav­ing an adequate sup­ply of suit­ably qual­i­fied staff so that these situ­ations don’t arise is Man­age­ment 101.”

Share:

3 Responses

  1. So what happened next? I did­n’t even ask any­one who would know last night wheth­er any­one from here (Can­ter­bury) ended up going — obvi­ously the lads were agreed through the week that we’re in nation­wide solid­ar­ity, and half expec­ted the pin to be pulled.

  2. Situ­ation has been resolved as I under­stand Luke, as the port com­pany has agreed to train Loc­al 13 work­ers. But will check final out­come.
    Vic­tor

  3. Thanky­ou for all your sup­port in Auckland,we man­aged to get the Port com­pany to agree to use our B Register and employed on a fixed term con­tract people that were made redund­ant to fill the short­falls.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Welcome to the Maritime Union

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and was formed in 2002 when the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on joined togeth­er. We rep­res­ent water­front work­ers, sea­farers and related work­ers in New Zea­l­and.

Read More