Automation report confirms total debacle with failed Ports of Auckland project

A new report into the failure of the automation project at Ports of Auckland Limited (POAL) is a shocking indictment of previous management. What can be learned?

A new report into the fail­ure of the auto­ma­tion pro­ject at Ports of Auck­land Lim­ited (POAL) is a shock­ing indict­ment of pre­vi­ous man­age­ment. What can be learned?

Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and Nation­al Sec­ret­ary Craig Har­ris­on says the inde­pend­ent report com­mis­sioned by Auck­land City, and released today, had iden­ti­fied mul­tiple fail­ures in gov­ernance, over­sight and account­ab­il­ity.

Mr Har­ris­on says the costs of the fiasco will run into hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars when tak­ing into account the delays caused by the pro­ject and recon­fig­ur­ing the ports and plant to manu­al oper­a­tion.

He says the Uni­on red flagged the pro­ject time and again, as Uni­on mem­bers worked on the ground at the Ports and iden­ti­fied numer­ous prob­lems.

“Sadly, our con­cerns were dis­reg­arded at the time, but if the Board and Coun­cil had listened, the pro­ject would not have had this frankly dis­astrous out­come.”

He says the auto­ma­tion plan came on top of an anti-uni­on agenda at the Ports under the lead­er­ship of former CEO Tony Gib­son.

Mr Gib­son is facing charges under health and safety legis­la­tion from his time as CEO when sev­er­al deaths occurred at the Ports – and anoth­er Coun­cil report found massive fail­ings in health and safety prac­tice at the Ports dur­ing his ten­ure.

Mr Har­ris­on says the decision to scrap the auto­ma­tion pro­ject by the incom­ing POAL CEO had been the only logic­al move, and there was now a more respect­ful rela­tion­ship between seni­or man­age­ment and the Uni­on work­force at POAL.

“Ports of Auck­land has a great future, but has to make up for a lost dec­ade when an anti-work­er, arrog­ant and unac­count­able man­age­ment cul­ture was off the leash at the Ports – and les­sons must be learned from what happened.”

Mr Har­ris­on says as the Union’s pre­vi­ous warn­ings have been vin­dic­ated, the way to ensure bet­ter res­ults in future was to have a Uni­on mem­ber on the Board of Dir­ect­ors to rep­res­ent the work­ers view­point, a com­mon prac­tice in many suc­cess­ful eco­nom­ies.

 

Share:

One Response

  1. I would like to know how many ships are fully crewed by NZ sea­farers ie officers and rat­ings.
    Your pro­pos­al to have the new Chath­am Islands ship fully crew by NZ sea­men must be strongly pur­sued.
    I belong to the Nel­son branch of the MN Asso­ci­ation. We are an age­ing group of ex sea­farers who all worked on the coast when there were dozens of NZ flagged ves­sels . I per­son­ally am keen to see a more con­cer­ted effort to increase the NZ fleet as I’m sure all our mem­bers are .
    How can we put more pres­sure on Gov­ern­ment to achieve this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Welcome to the Maritime Union

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and was formed in 2002 when the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on joined togeth­er. We rep­res­ent water­front work­ers, sea­farers and related work­ers in New Zea­l­and.

Read More