Holcim lashes out and threatens New Zealand Government for following maritime laws

MV Buffalo at Port of Timaru
The Maritime Union of New Zealand has condemned global cement giant Holcim’s threats to use 500 trucks a month to transport cement on New Zealand roads, rather than crew a ship with New Zealand seafarers.
The Mar­itime Union of New Zealand has con­demned glob­al cement giant Holcim’s threats to use 500 trucks a month to trans­port cement on New Zealand roads, rather than crew a ship with New Zealand sea­far­ers.
Mar­itime Union of New Zealand Nation­al Sec­re­tary Carl Find­lay says Hol­cim man­age­ment should stop dig­ging itself into a big­ger hole.
He says Holcim’s state­ment on 10 Decem­ber 2025 that it will com­mence plans to haul approx­i­mate­ly 15,000 addi­tion­al tonnes of bulk cement in over 500 trucks on New Zealand roads every month is not a viable logis­tics solu­tion.
“Hol­cim has a straight­for­ward answer to their self-inflict­ed prob­lem, which is to utilise a New Zealand-flagged and crewed ves­sel.”
Mr Find­lay says the threats from Hol­cim appear to be an ama­teur attempt to strong-arm the New Zealand Gov­ern­ment into dis­re­gard­ing New Zealand mar­itime law.
Mr Find­lay says the Mar­itime Union reaf­firms its strong sup­port for the deci­sion made by Asso­ciate Min­is­ter of Trans­port James Mea­ger to uphold exist­ing reg­u­la­tions.
Min­is­ter Mea­ger cor­rect­ly declined an appli­ca­tion lodged by NovaAl­go­ma Cement Car­ri­ers (NACC) for an autho­ri­sa­tion under Sec­tion 198(2) of the Mar­itime Trans­port Act to use a for­eign-flagged and crewed ship to replace its local cement car­ri­er MV Buf­fa­lo.
Mr Find­lay says coastal ship­ping is the most effi­cient and low­est-emis­sion method of bulk trans­porta­tion, achiev­ing sig­nif­i­cant­ly low­er emis­sions per tonne of freight moved com­pared to road.
“Holcim’s threat to jam hun­dreds of trucks onto New Zealand roads through spite has destroyed its social licence and pub­lic cred­i­bil­i­ty. This is a com­pa­ny gen­er­at­ing mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar glob­al prof­its threat­en­ing envi­ron­men­tal harm and sup­ply chain risk on New Zealand, sim­ply because it failed to find a loop­hole in the sys­tem.”
Mr Find­lay says New Zealand indus­try stake­hold­ers who rely on sta­ble and eth­i­cal sup­ply chains, par­tic­u­lar­ly major con­struc­tion and infra­struc­ture clients, should note Holcim’s behav­iour and move swift­ly to its com­peti­tors for their cement sup­plies.
Holcim’s plan to replace the New Zealand-flagged MV Buf­fa­lo with the Pana­man­ian-flagged NACC Vega crewed by for­eign labour on infe­ri­or terms and con­di­tions was a bla­tant attempt to exploit for­eign sea­far­ers and cir­cum­vent the law through Flag of Con­ve­nience (FOC) ship­ping.
For a glob­al com­pa­ny that pro­motes itself as a sus­tain­able, pro­gres­sive busi­ness and ‘Top Employ­er 2025’, opt­ing for a Kiwi-crewed coastal ship would be a sign of its com­mit­ment to New Zealand. Instead, Hol­cim is act­ing like a play­ground bul­ly, says Mr Find­lay.
“I won­der if the local man­age­ment of Hol­cim has gone rogue, as it seems unlike­ly their cor­po­rate head­quar­ters in Switzer­land would be impressed by this type of behav­iour.”
The Mar­itime Union says Hol­cim needs to apol­o­gise to New Zealand, accept the deci­sion of the Gov­ern­ment to abide by the laws of New Zealand, and nego­ti­ate for a New Zealand crew for a coastal cement ves­sel, says Mr Find­lay.
Share the Post:

Related Posts