Maritime Union calls for Government review of Marsden Point closure

Marsden Point oil refinery
The closure of Marsden Point refinery is sending New Zealand on a high risk track at a bad time.

The Mar­itime Union says the clo­sure of Mars­den Point refin­ery is send­ing New Zealand on a high risk track at a bad time.

Mar­itime Union of New Zealand Nation­al Sec­re­tary Craig Har­ri­son says the clo­sure is a giant step back­wards for New Zealand’s ener­gy secu­ri­ty.

The announce­ment by Refin­ing NZ that the refin­ery will be replaced by a ter­mi­nal for import­ed fuel is a major shift in New Zealand’s fuel arrange­ments, he says.

He says Refin­ing NZ CEO Nao­mi James needs to pro­vide an iron clad guar­an­tee that fuel sup­ply to New Zealand will not be endan­gered.

Mr Har­ri­son says the impli­ca­tions for fuel secu­ri­ty around New Zealand are very seri­ous, espe­cial­ly for region­al economies and the pri­ma­ry sec­tor.

He says out­side Auck­land, fuel is cur­rent­ly shipped from Mars­den Point to ports using New Zealand flagged and crewed ves­sels, whose future could be in jeop­ardy, with future sup­plies pos­si­bly deliv­ered to ports by inter­na­tion­al ves­sels.

He says the great les­son of the last year has been that rely­ing on inter­na­tion­al ship­ping and sup­ply chains is no longer a safe option, espe­cial­ly for small remote mar­kets like New Zealand.

“Just ask any one in any provin­cial port around New Zealand what the reli­a­bil­i­ty of inter­na­tion­al ship­ping ser­vices has been in the last year – it has been com­plete chaos.”

Mr Har­ri­son says there are mul­ti­ple down­sides to the clo­sure deci­sion, includ­ing the loss of employ­ment and the loss of essen­tial skills as the work­force moves on.

“We need to be look­ing at the big pic­ture for New Zealand, not what is most prof­itable for a pri­vate­ly owned cor­po­ra­tion.”

Mr Har­ri­son says the fact that Ener­gy Min­is­ter Megan Woods took a paper to Cab­i­net with a pro­pos­al for secur­ing the future of the refin­ery was a clear indi­ca­tion that clo­sure was a risky strat­e­gy.

He says the Gov­ern­ment was giv­ing too much cre­dence to the word of a pri­vate cor­po­ra­tion with its own agen­da and inter­ests.

Ener­gy secu­ri­ty and sup­ply chain secu­ri­ty were now big glob­al issues and the Gov­ern­ment should review the deci­sion and work to keep the refin­ery in oper­a­tion, says Mr Har­ri­son.

He says the con­tin­ued exis­tence of the refin­ery would pro­vide essen­tial secu­ri­ty for fuel, as crude oil for refin­ing was obtain­able for mul­ti­ple sources, and would also main­tain an impor­tant domes­tic skill base and sup­ply net­work.

 

Share the Post:

Related Posts