Port workers reject ‘privatisation’ roadmap for Lyttelton Port Company

Workers at Ports of Lyttelton have strongly rejected an attack on their work in a privatisation report to the Christchurch City Council.

Work­ers at Ports of Lyt­tel­ton have strong­ly reject­ed an attack on their work in a pri­vati­sa­tion report to the Christchurch City Coun­cil.

LPC work­ers are mem­bers of the Mar­itime Union of New Zealand (MUNZ) and the Rail and Mar­itime Trans­port Union (RMTU).

A report on Christchurch City Hold­ings Lim­it­ed and its com­pa­nies com­piled by Nor­thing­ton Part­ners was released this week.

The report states LPC is under­per­form­ing – and sug­gests this is due to a “high­ly unionised work­force.”

Mar­itime Union of New Zealand Nation­al Sec­re­tary Craig Har­ri­son says there are around six hun­dred port work­ers in Lyt­tel­ton who deliv­er to the peo­ple of Christchurch and Can­ter­bury, the major­i­ty being LPC employ­ees.

Despite the report stat­ing pro­duc­tiv­i­ty issues are ‘out­side scope’ and were ‘not analysed’, it offers a view based on ‘ini­tial obser­va­tions and stake­hold­er feed­back.’

No sources for these obser­va­tions or feed­back are pro­vid­ed.

Mr Har­ri­son says this is unac­cept­able.

He says a ref­er­ence to the Port of Tau­ran­ga as a pre­ferred employ­ment mod­el shows an absolute lack of under­stand­ing of seri­ous prob­lems in the ports indus­try.

Mr Har­ri­son says the out­sourc­ing employ­ment mod­el at Port of Tau­ran­ga has had very poor out­comes for work­ers.

“One of the worst impacts has been employ­ees of con­tract­ing steve­dores hav­ing unhealthy and dan­ger­ous shift pat­terns, which has dis­rupt­ed fam­i­ly life, health and safe­ty.”

“The implied sup­port in the report for con­tract­ing out labour – obvi­ous­ly to reduce wages and con­di­tions – con­tra­dicts the Cor­po­rate Social Respon­si­bil­i­ty mod­el that CCHL orga­ni­za­tions must abide by.”

Mr Har­ri­son says these con­tract­ing out issues have been wide­ly cov­ered in the media and recog­nised nation­al­ly in 2022 in two ways.

A recent Employ­ment Court deci­sion requires a large pri­vate steve­dore in Tau­ran­ga to change its oper­a­tions to acknowl­edge work­ers ‘avail­abil­i­ty’ to pro­tect their work/life bal­ance and right to fam­i­ly life.

In addi­tion, the nation­al ports indus­try has just announced nation­al ports health and safe­ty guide­lines which focus on the impact of fatigue due to shift work.

Rail and Mar­itime Trans­port Union Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary Todd Val­ster says he is unim­pressed with the log­ic used the report which is clear­ly a roadmap for pri­vati­sa­tion.

“We need to main­tain our local assets and defend them against the pri­vati­sa­tion agen­da.”

Mr Val­ster says the report makes an error in try­ing to draw sim­plis­tic com­par­isons between Lyt­tel­ton and oth­er ports like Tau­ran­ga, when size and many oth­er vari­ables influ­ence out­comes.

“It is dan­ger­ous when peo­ple with­out a deep knowl­edge of the ports indus­try start set­ting them­selves up as experts in port pro­duc­tiv­i­ty.”

Mr Val­ster says the pri­ma­ry out­come for a port must always be whether it is serv­ing its pur­pose as key infra­struc­ture.

“The ben­e­fits LPC pro­vides as a reli­able import/export hub for indus­try are enor­mous.”

Share the Post:

Related Posts