Ports of Auckland strike notices intended to focus CEO

The Maritime Union and its members are concerned about protecting conditions of employment, secure jobs, and ensuring a strong collective agreement.

The Mar­itime Union has put in a fur­ther 48-hour strike notice at Ports of Auck­land from 7am on Fri­day 30 Decem­ber until 7 am Sun­day 1 Jan­u­ary 2012.

Mar­itime Union Nation­al Pres­i­dent Gar­ry Parsloe says the strike notice is a legal require­ment and can be with­drawn as soon as any progress is made with Ports of Auck­land CEO Tony Gib­son.

“The answer is in Mr Gib­son’s hands. He can stop try­ing to attack the union and the major­i­ty of his own work­force and start deal­ing with the real issues. It’s sim­ply a case of try­ing to get him back on track.”

Mr Parsloe says the issue is not and has nev­er been about wage increas­es.

What the Mar­itime Union and its mem­bers are con­cerned about is pro­tect­ing the con­di­tions of employ­ment, secure jobs, and ensur­ing a strong col­lec­tive agree­ment, he says.

“The posi­tion of the CEO has no cred­i­bil­i­ty. First of all he tries to offer non union work­ers a much greater wage increase than mem­bers of the union in a bla­tant attempt to under­mine the col­lec­tive agree­ment. Then he waves mon­ey around when this incon­ve­nient fact is point­ed out to him. But it has noth­ing to do with the real issues at hand.”

Mr Gib­son’s state­ments about flex­i­bil­i­ty while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly claim­ing that he intend­ed respect­ing employ­ees’ pref­er­ences about when they work were hol­low, says Mr Parsloe.

“You don’t respect some­thing by under­min­ing it. The flex­i­bil­i­ty Mr Gib­son describes means work­ers give up their fam­i­ly time, per­son­al life and nor­mal exis­tence to be called into work when­ev­er the employ­er wants. That’s the flex­i­bil­i­ty he means, in a nut­shell.”

Mr Parsloe says Mr Gib­son seems to think fam­i­ly time or reg­u­lar hours and secure jobs are “restric­tive and old fash­ioned”.

“It is this atti­tude of regard­ing the well­be­ing of his employ­ees as an imped­i­ment to rak­ing in even more prof­it that is caus­ing so many prob­lems in these nego­ti­a­tions.”

Mr Parsloe says the POAL agen­da is also reflect­ed in con­tin­ued let­ters from Mr Gib­son to mem­bers homes that have cre­at­ed stress and con­cern for fam­i­ly mem­bers by threat­en­ing con­tract­ing out of work at the port.

He says there is an agen­da of out­sourc­ing and casu­al­iza­tion behind Ports of Auck­land man­age­men­t’s approach and that until Mr Gib­son starts to nego­ti­ate on a more sen­si­ble basis, the strike notices will remain in place.

“If port users are con­cerned about the effect of these stop­pages, we sug­gest they con­sid­er the result of some of Mr Gib­son’s more hare-brained con­cepts that he is throw­ing around, such as com­plete con­tract­ing out.”

 

Share the Post:

Related Posts