Ports of Auckland workforce alienated by CEO’s actions

The Maritime Union of New Zealand says Ports of Auckland CEO Tony Gibson's approach to the current industrial dispute is having a "catastrophic effect" on negotiations to resolve the industrial dispute at the Port.

The Mar­itime Union of New Zealand says Ports of Auck­land CEO Tony Gib­son’s approach to the cur­rent indus­tri­al dis­pute is hav­ing a “cat­a­stroph­ic effect” on nego­ti­a­tions to resolve the indus­tri­al dis­pute at the Port.

Mar­itime Union Nation­al Pres­i­dent Gar­ry Parsloe says port work­ers he had spo­ken to had been upset and dis­turbed at the con­tin­u­ous stream of let­ters from the CEO that were appear­ing in their let­ter­box­es.

“This CEO has the gall to tell the media that his com­ments aren’t intim­i­dat­ing work­ers because ‘they are part of us’. Has he asked them?”

Mr Parsloe says the rea­son work­ers were con­cerned was their CEO was send­ing out let­ters two weeks before Christ­mas, that tell his work­force he is think­ing about out­sourc­ing all their jobs and putting them out of work.

“I’m not sure how that qual­i­fies for a car­ing and shar­ing approach. Is this nego­ti­a­tion or stand over tac­tics?”

Mr Parsloe says if Mr Gib­son want­ed to com­mu­ni­cate with work­ers there were plen­ty of notice­boards around the port to place mate­r­i­al.

“Our mem­bers have the right to go home to their fam­i­lies after the long hours and 24/7 shifts they put in with­out being under attack from let­ters threat­en­ing their liveli­hoods. It’s an inva­sion of pri­va­cy and it is cre­at­ing stress on fam­i­lies.”

“There is noth­ing ille­gal about what Mr Gib­son is doing. How­ev­er it is uneth­i­cal and not inci­den­tal­ly it is on the verge of cre­at­ing a com­plete break­down in his rela­tion­ship with most of his employ­ees.”

“No one is send­ing Tony Gib­son let­ters at home say­ing his job might be gone on a whim. Maybe his employ­ers should be send­ing him a let­ter like that and see how he likes it.”

Mr Parsloe says the pres­sure tac­tics are hav­ing the oppo­site effect to what Mr Gib­son intend­ed.

He says the work­ers want to nego­ti­ate col­lec­tive­ly, through their advo­cates.

Mr Parsloe says the Mar­itime Union mem­bers, who make up the major­i­ty of the Ports of Auck­land work­force, are com­plete­ly up to date with nego­ti­a­tions because they attend reg­u­lar meet­ings with their elect­ed nego­tia­tors.

“I will say that we speak to Ports of Auck­land work­ers quite a bit more than Mr Gib­son does. He just sends them let­ters telling them he is think­ing about throw­ing them out of work.”

“This is the prob­lem with this CEO, you can’t talk to some­one who won’t lis­ten. This is an indi­vid­ual with no social intel­li­gence.”

Mr Parsloe says the way the CEO was approach­ing the nego­ti­a­tions made work­ers believe there was an agen­da to deu­nion­ize, casu­al­ize and out­source.

He says that Mr Gib­son’s attempt­ed manip­u­la­tion of the loss of a Maer­sk ser­vice to Auck­land for polit­i­cal ends had under­mined the Ports cred­i­bil­i­ty, with even an edi­to­r­i­al in the New Zealand Her­ald polite­ly rub­bish­ing his claims.

“Maer­sk, the world’s biggest ship­ping line, has been only too hap­py to play this coun­try’s ports off against each oth­er. It was at it again this week, shift­ing one of its biggest con­tain­er ser­vices from Auck­land to Tau­ran­ga.

On the way through, it took a shot at trade unions, say­ing strike action at Auck­land had played a part in its deci­sion. That seems improb­a­ble. Maer­sk’s switch, which takes effect tomor­row, would have been the result of months of analy­sis, not the upshot of a few days’ indus­tri­al action. Nonethe­less, the ship­per’s deci­sion has again high­light­ed its influ­ence, not least in the way this can run counter to the nation­al inter­est.”

(Edi­to­r­i­al, Fri­day 9 Decem­ber 2011, New Zealand Her­ald)

Ports of Auck­land Lim­it­ed CEO Tony Gib­son is a for­mer man­ag­ing direc­tor of Maer­sk New Zealand.

 

 

Share the Post:

Related Posts