Maritime Union continues to press Ports of Auckland over dirty politics activities

Mar­itime Union Nation­al Pres­i­dent Gar­ry Parsloe says Ports of Auck­land man­age­ment is try­ing to get off the hook from its involve­ment with extreme right wing blog­gers dur­ing the Ports of Auck­land dis­pute.

Infor­ma­tion revealed in Nicky Hager’s new book “Dirty Pol­i­tics” shows that the POAL man­age­ment were act­ing in close con­cert with “attack” blog­gers and their asso­ciates in an anti-union cam­paign.

Mr Parsloe says CEO Tony Gib­son and the Board must reveal what rela­tion­ships and deal­ings it had with right wing attack blog­gers, whether paid or unpaid.

He says it was obvi­ous there was a net­work encom­pass­ing right wing blog­gers and their polit­i­cal asso­ciates, and senior fig­ures at the Ports, as out­lined in the book.

“It seems that an inner cir­cle, many with no con­nec­tion to the Port, were in the know about an agen­da that the own­ers of the port, the peo­ple of Auck­land, were kept in the dark about.”

Mr Parsloe says Auck­land City must ask the POAL Board and Man­age­ment was its focus on con­clud­ing nego­ti­a­tions – or was it engaged in an ide­o­log­i­cal cru­sade against its work­force?

He repeat­ed his query as to the price tag for exter­nal con­sul­tan­cy and pub­lic rela­tions ser­vices sup­plied to POAL dur­ing the dis­pute.

He says a state­ment by a POAL spokesper­son that he was “pret­ty con­fi­dent” mon­ey paid to out­side advis­ers at the time of the dis­pute did not go to a blog­ger was a cav­a­lier response, giv­en the seri­ous­ness of the sit­u­a­tion.

“Auck­land City must demand a yes or no answer from the CEO, not weasel words.”

“The own­ers of the port must demand a cat­e­gor­i­cal assur­ance from the Board and man­age­ment that pay­ments were not being fun­nelled to blog­gers or sim­i­lar agents through out­side con­trac­tors retained by the Port.”

“This ques­tion must be answered by the CEO and the Chair of the Board, on the pub­lic record.”

There was no trans­paren­cy or account­abil­i­ty as to how ratepay­ers mon­ey had been spent by the Ports of Auck­land pur­su­ing an agen­da against their own work­force, says Mr Parsloe.

Share the Post:

Related Posts