Ports action puts Auckland businesses and jobs at risk

The New Zealand Council of Trade Union says the actions of Ports of Auckland management puts Auckland businesses and jobs at risk

“The Ports of Auck­land man­age­ment decision not to settle a col­lect­ive agree­ment and to con­tin­ue with plans to dis­miss the cur­rent work­force and con­tract out the Port jobs dis­reg­ards the impact that more indus­tri­al unrest will have on Auck­land busi­nesses”, CTU pres­id­ent Helen Kelly said today.

“The issues raised by the Port regard­ing labour util­isa­tion have been addressed by the uni­on but it is determ­ined to con­tin­ue with its con­tract­ing plans regard­less of the fact that it has the option to settle this mat­ter and provide secur­ity of ser­vices to Auck­land busi­nesses. It is act­ing against the interests of all those that use the Port and could dra­mat­ic­ally affect busi­ness in Auck­land in already tough times”.

“The Port man­age­ment acknow­ledged in medi­ation last week that the uni­on pos­i­tion met its labour util­isa­tion con­cerns and would bring big sav­ings to the Port but in a high handed and arrog­ant way it has decided not to sort this dis­pute out and is also not giv­ing any thought to how the Auck­land eco­nomy will suf­fer”.

“The work­ers at the Port have made every effort to address the Port’s con­cerns and save their jobs”, Helen Kelly said.

“The Port seems to have no regard for its work­ers or the people of Auck­land who rely on ships get­ting in and out.  It is liv­ing in a dif­fer­ent world from the rest of us if it thinks Auck­land busi­ness needs this unne­ces­sary dis­pute”, she said.

Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Welcome to the Maritime Union

The Mari­time Uni­on of New Zea­l­and was formed in 2002 when the New Zea­l­and Water­front Work­ers’ Uni­on and the New Zea­l­and Sea­farers’ Uni­on joined togeth­er. We rep­res­ent water­front work­ers, sea­farers and related work­ers in New Zea­l­and.

Read More