Ports management and board must account for disruption to Auckland

The Maritime Union says Ports of Auckland must be held accountable for the significant disruption they are imposing on Auckland.

The Mar­itime Union says Ports of Auck­land must be held account­able for the sig­nif­i­cant dis­rup­tion they are impos­ing on Auck­land.

Cham­ber of Com­merce sur­vey report­ed today details the effect of the pro­longed employ­ment nego­ti­a­tions on Auck­land busi­ness­es.

Mar­itime Union Gar­ry Parsloe said that the nego­ti­a­tions should have been com­plet­ed months ago.

“The real­i­ty is we have been con­tin­u­al­ly try­ing to sec­ond guess what Port man­age­ment real­ly needs to get this employ­ment agree­ment sort­ed.”

“We have tried sev­er­al times to address ros­ter­ing and util­i­sa­tion issues, and recent­ly tabled fur­ther a com­pre­hen­sive new pro­pos­al.”

“The only response we have ever got is that they want total flex­i­bil­i­ty in the work­place and pro­pos­als that would see wharfies hav­ing no guar­an­teed days off, no pro­tec­tion against casu­al­i­sa­tion and a pack­age that would sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduce their pay.”

Gar­ry Parsloe said the prob­lems iden­ti­fied in the Cham­ber sur­vey were in addi­tion to the impact of the dis­pute on work­ers in relat­ed indus­tries like logis­tics and retail, cus­tomers, and res­i­dents of Auck­land who all want this issue resolved.

“The Ports are one of Auckland’s most impor­tant assets, and they need to be run well on behalf of the city’s res­i­dents.”

“As cur­rent guardians of this asset, Ports man­age­ment and gov­er­nance are frankly not up to the job.  They need to be held account­able for the incon­ve­nience and cost to Auck­lan­ders.”

“A com­plete change of cul­ture is need­ed at Ports of Auck­land, and peo­ple brought in who can run this asset prop­er­ly for Auck­land.”

Gar­ry Parsloe said that although Cham­ber of Com­merce head Michael Bar­nett has iden­ti­fied the prob­lem he hasn’t offered any solu­tions.

“Instead of blind­ing sup­port­ing the Port com­pa­ny, why doesn’t he step up and put his ener­gy into actu­al­ly find­ing a solu­tion, to get back the pro­duc­tive work­ing Port we once had before Port lead­er­ship start­ed mis­man­ag­ing it so bad­ly dur­ing these nego­ti­a­tions.”

“Bar­nett rep­re­sents an old fash­ioned response to indus­tri­al rela­tions, and it’s time we had mod­ern employ­er organ­i­sa­tions in New Zealand.”

The par­ties will next week joint­ly seek facil­i­ta­tion from the Employ­ment Rela­tions Author­i­ty, and Gar­ry Parsloe said the Mar­itime Union would be tak­ing all of the facilitator’s rec­om­men­da­tions seri­ous­ly.

Share the Post:

Related Posts