Ports of Auckland management dealings with political activists creates angry response from workers

The Maritime Union says that the Ports of Auckland management has deliberately undermined negotiations by releasing letters to its employees to hostile political activists.

The Mar­itime Union says that the Ports of Auck­land man­age­ment has delib­er­ate­ly under­mined nego­ti­a­tions by releas­ing let­ters to its employ­ees to hos­tile polit­i­cal activists.

Mar­itime Union Nation­al Pres­i­dent Gar­ry Parsloe says the far right wing polit­i­cal blog­ger Cameron Slater of Whale Oil blog was boast­ing on his web­site about being giv­en let­ters about cur­rent nego­ti­a­tions intend­ed for Ports of Auck­land employ­ees by Ports of Auck­land man­age­ment.

The let­ters had been uploaded into the pub­lic domain and used as the basis for vitu­per­a­tive attacks on Ports of Auck­land work­ers by the blog.

Mr Parsloe says this “mas­sive dis­re­spect” by man­age­ment had been greet­ed with dis­be­lief by Mar­itime Union mem­bers at Ports of Auck­land.

“Not only has Ports of Auck­land CEO Tony Gib­son gone against the spe­cif­ic requests of Mar­itime Union mem­bers to nego­ti­ate through their elect­ed offi­cials rather than bom­bard­ing them with let­ters, he has now gone beyond the pale by send­ing hos­tile polit­i­cal activists com­plete mis­in­for­ma­tion about wages and con­fi­den­tial let­ters to his own staff.”

Mr Parsloe says he now has a chal­lenge for Ports of Auck­land CEO Tony Gib­son.

“The chal­lenge is for him to imme­di­ate­ly release all doc­u­men­ta­tion regard­ing his salary and perks, and that of all senior man­age­ment at Ports of Auck­land, into the pub­lic domain for open dis­cus­sion.”

“Let the pub­lic decide whether he is worth his wages and spe­cial ben­e­fits. Con­sid­er­ing the unfold­ing dis­as­ter he has cre­at­ed at his work­place, they may be sur­prised at his gen­er­ous remu­ner­a­tion.”

Mr Parsloe says Ports of Auck­land work­ers were angry by claims of inflat­ed wages when many worked hun­dreds of hours of over­time a year on round the clock shifts includ­ing overnight, week­ends and pub­lic hol­i­days in a heavy indus­tri­al envi­ron­ment.

“Mr Gib­son has politi­cized this dis­pute by involv­ing extrem­ist polit­i­cal activists in our nego­ti­a­tions.”

“It’s extreme­ly hard to get nego­ti­a­tions on track when Mr Gib­son con­tin­ues to destroy his rela­tion­ship with employ­ees by strange and bizarre actions like this.”

Mr Parsloe says the involve­ment of oth­er third par­ties in the dis­pute such as the Auck­land Cham­ber of Com­merce, who were run­ning a clan­des­tine email cam­paign based on dis­cred­it­ed infor­ma­tion, had also set back nego­ti­a­tions at the Ports of Auck­land.

Mr Parsloe says if Mr Gib­son wants to involve extrem­ist right wing blog­gers, the Cham­ber of Com­merce, and oth­er exter­nal unre­lat­ed third par­ties in nego­ti­a­tions, then he was enti­tled to do this.

“He can nego­ti­ate with his friends all he wants. Unfor­tu­nate­ly none of them work at Ports of Auck­land mov­ing con­tain­ers and car­ry­ing out all the essen­tial work around the Port, so it is hard to see how it is going to achieve much.”

“In the case of Ports of Auck­land work­ers, Mr Gib­son’s cred­i­bil­i­ty is at an all time low. This should be of major con­cern to local users of the port who will con­tin­ue to be dis­ad­van­taged and dis­rupt­ed by the fail­ure to get nego­ti­a­tions back on track by Mr Gib­son.”

 

Share the Post:

Related Posts